26 FBI Agents at Jan 6!

[YOSUP]

@Sknyluv

@Smyrna

How? How do you KNOW this?

It’s in the article and the report? Look, if you don’t trust the report and think they are lying, that’s your own deal.

It’s also in the article an FBI agent eluded to Trump Supporters as terrorists, so yah still not good for the left.

[YOSUP]

@thinkingman

@Sknyluv

@thinkingman

the fbi paid a few dozen people to be in the crowd.

Again. No. Only three were there on any official capacity.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said there were more than two dozen confidential human sources (CHSs) in the crowd outside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but only three were assigned by the FBI to be present for the event,

“If a confidential human source is directed to be at a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for their time.”

now, what is wrong in my post?

They are arguing over the capacity! Well Ray Epps did far worse and got off on technicalities. We see what’s going on.

[DougBH]

@Independent4Life

Showing up to an open event (one they would have been at anyway) isn’t infiltrating🤣

I didn’t infiltrate a crypto convention and a cybersecurity conference. They are going about their day as normal while keeping an eye open for stuff that interests the FBI

Wow. So their normal day was going to a Trump protest rally and some entering restricted areas on their own? So, again, why not hunted down and prosecuted like others?

[Sknyluv]

@thinkingman

“If a confidential human source is directed to be at a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for their time.”

now, what is wrong in my post?

You said, “the fbi paid a few dozen people to be in the crowd.” That is wrong. Only 3 CHSs were instructed, being paid, to be there. The rest were there under their own volition and were not being paid. So therefore, your “few dozen” number is wrong.

[PurpnGold]

@YOSUP

@PurpnGold

@Sknyluv

@YOSUP

What was that informants instruction?

Here you are.

“One FBI field office tasked a CHS to travel to DC to report on the activities of a predicated domestic terrorism subject who was separately planning to travel to DC for the January 6 Electoral Certification; a second FBI field office tasked a CHS to travel to DC to potentially report on two domestic terrorism (DT) subjects from another FBI field office who were planning to travel to DC for the events of January 6; and a third CHS, who had informed their handling agent that they intended to travel to DC on their own initiative for the events of January 6, was similarly tasked by their field office to potentially report on two DT subjects from other FBI field offices who were planning to travel to DC for the events of January 6,” the report states.

If they would just read and comprehend the article… they could save themselves a bit of embarrassment.

But here we are…

LOL so the FBI is saying Trump supporters are terrorists who must be watched? Yeah this is not the narrative I would run with.

No, just rioters when they gather in a large group to “stop the steal” particularly when nothing was stolen

[YOSUP]

@DougBH

@Independent4Life

Showing up to an open event (one they would have been at anyway) isn’t infiltrating🤣

I didn’t infiltrate a crypto convention and a cybersecurity conference. They are going about their day as normal while keeping an eye open for stuff that interests the FBI

Wow. So their normal day was going to a Trump protest rally and some entering restricted areas on their own? So, again, why not hunted down and prosecuted like others?

Because Trump supporters are a terrorist threat to the FBI

[FreeAndClear]

@Zippy

@FreeAndClear

Right and until such time its supposition fed by bias.

So in your little fantasy world, Al Capone was responsible for No, Zero, murders.

Gotcha.

The fantasy world is yours presently.

Trying to equate the absence of evidence in Capone where there was common knowledge and this instance is one of the worse analogies but par for the course

Nobody ever saw Hitler kill anybody either. Stop.

[thinkingman]

@YOSUP

They are arguing over the capacity! Well Ray Epps did far worse and got off on technicalities. We see what’s going on.

they are mish-moshing words because they know they are once again, sigh, wrong

[Independent4Life]

@YOSUP

@DougBH

@Independent4Life

They are not telling random sources to do anything illegal.

Then they entered restricted areas on their own. Why not prosecuted like others who entered restricted areas on their own? Their trespasses were not fbi related, according to your theory.

Because the FBI instructed their informants to break the law, and the informant won’t rat on the agent in fear of they themselves being locked up.

No they didnt. When you first become a source they sit you down and say if you do anything illegal they wont protect you.

[YOSUP]

@FreeAndClear

@Zippy

@FreeAndClear

Right and until such time its supposition fed by bias.

So in your little fantasy world, Al Capone was responsible for No, Zero, murders.

Gotcha.

The fantasy world is yours presently.

Trying to equate the absence of evidence in Capone where there was common knowledge and this instance is one of the worse analogies but par for the course

Nobody ever saw Hitler kill anybody either. Stop.

Your right he didn’t, so how is his point any less valid?

[thinkingman]

@Sknyluv

You said, “the fbi paid a few dozen people to be in the crowd.” That is wrong.

@thinkingman

If a confidential human source is directed to be at a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for their time.”

i mean, do you even read?

[FreeAndClear]

@thinkingman

@YOSUP

They are arguing over the capacity! Well Ray Epps did far worse and got off on technicalities. We see what’s going on.

they are mish-moshing words because they know they are once again, sigh, wrong

Well no. It’s amazing how you took this report as proving you being correct or destroying any narrative

FBI informants were there. There is no evidence the fbi instigated any of it.

The whole mess is at the feet of the rioters.

[YOSUP]

@Independent4Life

@YOSUP

@DougBH

@Independent4Life

They are not telling random sources to do anything illegal.

Then they entered restricted areas on their own. Why not prosecuted like others who entered restricted areas on their own? Their trespasses were not fbi related, according to your theory.

Because the FBI instructed their informants to break the law, and the informant won’t rat on the agent in fear of they themselves being locked up.

No they didnt. When you first become a source they sit you down and say if you do anything illegal they wont protect you.

Lmao they are asked to do illegal stuff all the time! Whitey Bulger broke the law for years and was Robert Mueller’s informant.

[FreeAndClear]

Because there was common knowledge that Capone killed people. There were witnesses who refused to testify. There is no evidence of instigation. Just infiltration. That’s why the parallel is so silly.

[YOSUP]

@FreeAndClear

Because there was common knowledge that Capone killed people. There were witnesses who refused to testify. There is no evidence of instigation. Just infiltration. That’s why the parallel is so silly.

Kind of like informants refusing to testify on this?

[PurpnGold]

@DougBH

@Independent4Life

Showing up to an open event (one they would have been at anyway) isn’t infiltrating🤣

I didn’t infiltrate a crypto convention and a cybersecurity conference. They are going about their day as normal while keeping an eye open for stuff that interests the FBI

Wow. So their normal day was going to a Trump protest rally and some entering restricted areas on their own? So, again, why not hunted down and prosecuted like others?

How do you know the non sanctioned informants weren’t arrested? Hell, how you know that they were even IN the capitol?

[Independent4Life]

@Sknyluv

@thinkingman

“If a confidential human source is directed to be at a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for their time.”

now, what is wrong in my post?

You said, “the fbi paid a few dozen people to be in the crowd.” That is wrong. Only 3 CHSs were instructed, being paid, to be there. The rest were there under their own volition and were not being paid. So therefore, your “few dozen” number is wrong.

I highly doubt they were instructed to be there. They most likely told their handler a few weeks before j6 they planned on going and the handler gave them a few topics and maybe a picture of someone to look out for.

[thinkingman]

@FreeAndClear

There is no evidence the fbi instigated any of it.

i am not saying they did. but they were there and involved.

and absence of evidence…. you know

[Sknyluv]

@thinkingman

@Sknyluv

You said, “the fbi paid a few dozen people to be in the crowd.” That is wrong.

@thinkingman

If a confidential human source is directed to be at a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for their time.”

i mean, do you even read?

Yes. And only 3 out of the 26 were told to be at the Stop the Steal event. So only 3 were being paid to be there.

[YOSUP]

@Sknyluv

@thinkingman

@Sknyluv

You said, “the fbi paid a few dozen people to be in the crowd.” That is wrong.

@thinkingman

If a confidential human source is directed to be at a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for their time.”

i mean, do you even read?

Yes. And only 3 out of the 26 were told to be at the Stop the Steal event. So only 3 were being paid to be there.

That we know of!