2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 2)

[Samm]

@Orygun

@Samm

Absolutely. Every election should be open to be audited. Audits are the mechanism that keeps honest people honest. If you never test the system, you never know if it’s broken.

How many more audits in Arizona until youre satisfied with the outcome?

Why do you think that I’m unsatisfied?

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

If they were partisan hacks, how is it that they came up with more votes for Biden?

Their objective was to inject just enough questions into the process of how the election is done to have a reason to change voting laws to make it harder to vote.

There is only one side that is attacking the integrity of the vote these days. They want to make it so enough people don’t trust the results that the entire election gets thrown into question.

It is a very dangerous path that they are taking us down.

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

[CanadianJudo]

@NickN

@Jezcoe

There was no information as to the process of how the envelopes were imaged not was there any information on how his algorithm works.

The good doctor distinctly reviewed four types of images he looked for as follows: signatures, blank, nearly blank (.001), and scribble. The laxness of the 27 point algorithm referred to yesterday remains among the several open questions for Maricopa County officials to maybe answer. Again, why the verification standard even was lowered (at least 3 times) seemingly was miffing to Dr. Shiva’s yesterday and probably many others too.

Yet he couldn’t prove a single illegal vote.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

Sure, if you want to. Why not?

[FloridaYankee]

@NickN

@FloridaYankee

@NickN

Yes this is probably the new norm. How soon some of us probably have conveniently forgot it was only the 2016 general election where Dems questioning insisting a tie in of Russia with a Presidential candidate went on for several years.

There were no claims of that vote count being fraudulent.

Speaking of Russia, I provided earlier this week a report of them over there allegedly stuffing the ballot box and removing ballots too. This Arizona audit was clearly not focused on that kind of election illegality possibility.

Votes are tied to actual people. We know who voted. The number of envelopes from verified voters matches the number of ballots counted

[SottoVoce]

@Kelby

@SottoVoce

@Jezcoe

They just can’t let it go

MSN

Completely predictable. They have it in their minds that Trump won and won’t stop until they’ve “proven” it. This is the new normal for the Republican party.

Reminds me of those kids in sixth grade who still believed in Santa Claus.

They’ll just keep moving the goalposts in hope that something magically happens in their favor.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

Sure, if you want to. Why not?

Should there be an investigation into if an invisible Bigfoot changed the vote?

[Orygun]

@Samm

Why do you think that I’m unsatisfied?

Are you satisfied and have no need of further inquiry? Or would you support another round of “audits” happening?

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

Sure, if you want to. Why not?

Should there be an investigation into if an invisible Bigfoot changed the vote?

If you like. I’m not interested either way.

[Samm]

@Orygun

@Samm

Why do you think that I’m unsatisfied?

Are you satisfied and have no need of further inquiry? Or would you support another round of “audits” happening?

Why does what I think matter so much to you?

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

Sure, if you want to. Why not?

Should there be an investigation into if an invisible Bigfoot changed the vote?

If you like. I’m not interested either way.

Should the taxpayers pay for that investigation?

[Orygun]

@Samm

Why does what I think matter so much to you?

Ah the non answer- last refuge.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

Sure, if you want to. Why not?

Should there be an investigation into if an invisible Bigfoot changed the vote?

If you like. I’m not interested either way.

Should the taxpayers pay for that investigation?

Is it in the best interests of the public?

What’s the big obsession here? You guys claimed there was no evidence of fraud in the election, but now that you actually have some evidence to back that claim, you seem upset. Why?

[Samm]

@Orygun

@Samm

Why does what I think matter so much to you?

Ah the non answer- last refuge.

You seem to think that I took a stand on this issue before the audit was performed and that I should be upset about the results. Well I didn’t and I’m not. So you can save your efforts to extract answers from me to your loaded questions. I’m not playing.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

Sure, if you want to. Why not?

Should there be an investigation into if an invisible Bigfoot changed the vote?

If you like. I’m not interested either way.

Should the taxpayers pay for that investigation?

Is it in the best interests of the public?

What’s the big obsession here? You guys claimed there was no evidence of fraud in the election, but now that you actually have some evidence to back that claim, you seem upset. Why?

Why should taxpayer money be spent on every wild theory that is out there?

It doesn’t do one thing to secure an already secure election.

[Orygun]

I know most Trumpers think that endless “audits” serve them politically but a number of conservatives are espousing the opposite. When democracy itself is questioned it actually dampens conservative voter turnout. Look what happened in Georgia.

So I say bring on the Soros Bigfoot We wuz bamboozled I tells ya audit number 39!

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

The process should be questioned. It is the blind trust that some have that makes it vulnerable to being corrupted.

Should the questions of bamboo fibers be entertained?

Sure, if you want to. Why not?

Should there be an investigation into if an invisible Bigfoot changed the vote?

If you like. I’m not interested either way.

Should the taxpayers pay for that investigation?

Is it in the best interests of the public?

What’s the big obsession here? You guys claimed there was no evidence of fraud in the election, but now that you actually have some evidence to back that claim, you seem upset. Why?

Why should taxpayer money be spent on every wild theory that is out there?

It doesn’t do one thing to secure an already secure election.

As I said, audits provide the oversight that elections require to maintain public trust.

[Orygun]

@Samm

As I said, audits provide the oversight that elections require to maintain public trust.

Absolutely. And if it takes 100 audits that last through 2026- I say - there can never be enough oversight!

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

As I said, audits provide the oversight that elections require to maintain public trust.

But what if they are done by people who have never done anything like that before and entertain every bay ■■■■ crazy conspiracy out there?

Shouldn’t we avoid those?

Don’t those do more harm than good?