JayJay
3849
What metrics will you use to determine credibility/trustworthiness?
I imagine that the metric will be whether or not the audit says what he wants it to say.
Smyrna
3851
I know, how much I don’t know in this matter. I’d like to see the results and then listen to those who do have an expert opinion and one that isn’t biased and hear what they have to say? We’re almost there so, I can wait.
Smyrna
3852
You. I’d listen to what you have to say. My guess is that if there is honest data showing fraud, you have the integrity to acknowledge it. It’s not my area but I can still listen and see if I believe it adds up?
One of your links leads to the SoS’s pre-buttal which has some specific criticisms about elements of the audit. I suspect details of how the audit went about counting will get more discussion once the report is out.
https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/2020_Ballot_Review_Report_ver20210819-03_Review.pdf
There is some political complaining in there… but also some more detailed criticisms of how the tallies where managed on a batch-per-batch basis and how disagreements between ballot judges were resolved.
Hopefully the report spells out the process and confirms or discounts these criticisms.
If the report finds small errors and does not address the criticisms in this letter I’m not sure which count to give more credence to, the original or the audit.
Counting a million things by hand with dozens of people is complicated, and the process claimed in this letter looks less than perfect.
Oryx
3854
Without doing more research, I can only name the people named in the article.
That’s reasonable. The audit is being run by hardcore partisans with preconceived notions that the election was fraudulent, but if independent, bipartisan reviews of the audit come to the conclusion that it was legitimate, I’ll accept the results. But that seems very unlikely.
So what happened with this? What did the report say?
Chris
3856
The Cyber Ninjas report hasn’t been released yet. But we know that Doug Logan of Cyber Ninjas is not to be trusted, and he has already misrepresented data about those 74,000 mail-in ballots.
1 Like
What? The Gateway Pundit was wrong?
This was released today, instead of the report.
1 Like
you think a political statement from politicians who hate trump about the russia hoax means anything? how naive.
nope. the credibility of the report is about the information in it and how it was obtained.
Well if an expert opinion is required that rules out the ninja’s audit.
Would the corollary be that an audit undertaken by pro-Trump supporters be meaningless?
Says who? That sounds arse about face to me.
Chris
3866
The Cyber Ninjas think that they are above the law.
Smyrna
3868
(CNN)The report detailing the findings of contractors who conducted Arizona’s sham “audit” of last year’s election results –
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ and they call themselves news ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^