1372

One would have thought that krakeny strike force of elite Donald lawyers would have found some fraud.

Outside of that one PA guy who voted for Donald for his dead mother.

1373

You should go on tour and reassure them, because you just saying it doesn’t magically make it so.

I’m not sure. There are some, I know, that claims of fraud were in the filings, but then pulled from those filings.

How many times have democrats claimed voter fraud over the years?

1374

Haha! True. But I’m old. I wanna just put them down.

1 Like
1376

There were zero claims of fraud.

There was no evidence for it and you can’t lie to a judge.

That part is what we call bad.

1377

That’s not true. From what I recall there were claims of fraud filed and then pulled from those filings. The excuse given was that the burden of proof to make the case for fraud was much greater than irregularities that would net the same results.

So you can claim there were zero claims of fraud, but you’d just be wrong.

2 Likes
1378

There were zero claims of fraud brought before a judge because there was no evidence of fraud and you can’t do that and keep your law license.

If there was an overwhelming case for fraud… then the evidence would have been laid out in court.

But they had nothing… nada… zilch… zippo…

This whole thing about distrust in the election is pure propaganda to sew discord.

And enough people are falling for the disinfo campaign that it will have real world consequences. All because the GOP sees political advantage in doing this.

2 Likes
1379

So diebold was pure propaganda?

1380

That was dumb hysterics. Never panned out to be anything.

But I thought we were limiting the discussion to 2020… are we doing that?

1381

I asked a question.

1382

Who gives a ■■■■■

They were just as wrong.

1383

They paid $50 million after being indicted, and that’s never panned out to be anything? I think Diebold would disagree 50 million times.

1385

Right…wasn’t enough to overturn the results.

1386

Handwave. It’s all you got, huh?

Americans don’t trust parts of our election system, and your answer is to handwave, “yes they do.”

1387

How convenient to say that now.

2 Likes
1388

I don’t have a pathalogical need to defend every idiot who is on “my side”

1389

But yet pathological need to accuse others.

1 Like
1390

It isn’t a handwave.

Has it been shown with any real evidence that any election has had so much rampant fraud that the results have been changed?

Nope.

Only accusations.

1391

Who do I accuse?

1392

Would you like to discuss the electoral college vs popular vote? Is that closer to “your side” of things? Seemed to be a big topic about faith in our system before the election…

BTW, it doesn’t matter the flavor, trust in our elections is low for many reasons. You can’t just fold your arms and say “uh uhhh they’re not!”

1393

Are you not accusing cons of making up false election fraud?