2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 1)

JayJay · 2021-01-02T16:29:33.635Z

WildRose:

No we don’t, it’s unknowable.

All we catch, all we can catch are the stupidest and most egregious offenders.

It’s not unknowable.

WildRose · 2021-01-02T16:29:53.291Z

No, what I showed is a tiny handful that are caught and many if not most who even when caught are not prosecuted.

WildRose · 2021-01-02T16:33:54.045Z

Of course it is. You cannot possibly know how many people are not caught.

JayJay · 2021-01-02T16:53:27.979Z

WildRose:

Of course it is. You cannot possibly know how my people are not caught.

Yes…you actually can.

tnt · 2021-01-02T16:58:48.998Z

WildRose:

And since then they’ve refused to even entertain any more such cases because they don’t want to be seen as interfering in the political process.

Roberts has said as much.

They should’t interfere in politics. But following the constitution re: elections isn’t politics.

Chris · 2021-01-02T17:00:28.616Z

Smyrna:

Here is a brand new video of a newly elected Congressman from North Carolina. He outlines very clearly the fraud that has plagued the 2020 election.

GOP Senator Tillis and Trump won North Carolina during the 2020 election. Was there some voter fraud in North Carolina during the 2020 election that Tillis and Trump probably didn’t legitimately win North Carolina?? I haven’t watched the video yet.

Smyrna · 2021-01-02T17:02:51.054Z

Chris:

GOP Senator Tillis and Trump won North Carolina during the 2020 election. Was there some voter fraud in North Carolina during the 2020 election that Tillis and Trump probably didn’t legitimately win North Carolina?? I haven’t watched the video yet.

The new representative spells out exactly where the election is questionable and it’s based on laws not being followed. As you spelled out, those two won. Also, a Democrat Governor won in North Carolina…which tends to corroborate that the NC election, was an honest one.

Sknyluv · 2021-01-02T17:16:01.510Z

WildRose:

No, what I showed is a tiny handful that are caught and many if not most who even when caught are not prosecuted.

Wait a second. You showed cases where people got caught by our system.

That shows our systems work.

You did not show evidence where people didn’t get caught.

You’re assuming that because some people get caught, others are not getting caught. Those assumptions are unfounded.

What specifically about our current systems are not working?

JayJay · 2021-01-02T17:20:01.338Z

Sknyluv:

WildRose:

No, what I showed is a tiny handful that are caught and many if not most who even when caught are not prosecuted.

Wait a second. You showed cases where people got caught by our system.

That shows our systems work.

You did not show evidence where people didn’t get caught.

You’re assuming that because some people get caught, others are not getting caught. Those assumptions are unfounded.

What specifically about our current systems are not working?

Again following an illogical argument that because some fraud was caught, some unknowable amount of uncaught fraud must be happening.

But it’s only unknowable if you ignore anything about statistical process controls.

enki · 2021-01-02T17:21:37.931Z

NickN:

GrandWazoo:

What evidence?

You heard the POTUS.

Film on the 6th.

Bombshell’s.

They probably got Biden dead to rights.

Maybe too proof of many more compromised politicians -Congress members, Governors,etc.

Fantasy. He’s pulling his sheep by the nostril.

WildRose · 2021-01-02T17:30:04.087Z

Horse ■■■■■ at best you can estimate and those estimates will always be biased in favor of whomever is doing them.

mobiusptc · 2021-01-02T17:34:57.922Z

JayJay:

Then again, people don’t make decisions based on logic,

All about feelings. No fact, no willingness to read and learn , and certainly not introspection. Such a sad way to go through life.

Sknyluv · 2021-01-02T17:35:11.283Z

That video was well produced. There were a lot of bold statements and lofty rhetoric, with very little corroborating evidence.

I’ll let others fact check his claims.

I did notice though, he left out Texas as one of he states he plans on rejecting. Given that his entire premise is that state legislators must make election law, why did he ignore that Texas made electoral changes without legislative approval?

Seems to me that if he wants to be seen as principled and consistent, he should object to all cases, even those in which Trump won, and not just those states in which Biden won.

He comes off as polished, yet partisan.

Chris · 2021-01-02T17:40:03.495Z

Smyrna:

The new representative spells out exactly where the election is questionable and it’s based on laws not being followed. As you spelled out, those two won. Also, a Democrat Governor won in North Carolina…which tends to corroborate that the NC election, was an honest one.

I strongly believe that Arizona here had an honest election. Arizona has a pretty strict voter ID law along with mail-in ballots having to be in by Election Day. But many Trump supporters don’t believe that Arizona had an honest election, particular in Maricopa County.

Maricopa County is by far the most populated County in Arizona with about 61% of Arizona people voting from Maricopa County during the 2020 election. While Trump and former Senator McSally lost in Maricopa County, the GOP Maricopa County Attorney won her race while the Democratic Recorder for Maricopa County lost a very close race to his GOP opponent. That clearly signifies to me that Maricopa County, AZ had an honest election.

And Maricopa County wasn’t the only Arizona County where Biden improved over Hillary Clinton. Biden also improved over Clinton in Pima County (Tuscon), Cochise County and improved over Clinton from the northern Arizona Counties of Coconino, Navajo and Apache.

wiley8425 · 2021-01-02T17:41:55.757Z

Isn’t that one of the reasons why the SCOTUS determined they had no standing? Suing other states for something they did themselves?

mobiusptc · 2021-01-02T17:42:17.192Z

The Hill – 2 Jan 21

11 Senate Republicans say they will oppose Electoral College results Wednesday

Eleven Senate Republicans on Saturday announced that they will object to the Electoral College results Wednesday, when Congress convenes in a joint session to formally count the vote.

Accordingly, we intend to vote on Jan. 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed," they added.

I remember when dems did this in 2000 and 2016

TheDoctorIsIn · 2021-01-02T17:44:01.428Z

The Supreme Court did not elaborate on their decision finding no standing, except to say:

The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

Borgia_dude · 2021-01-02T18:00:04.584Z

WildRose:

Of course it is. You cannot possibly know how my people are not caught.

Your people?

mobiusptc · 2021-01-02T18:03:04.249Z

Borgia_dude:

Your people?

Damn, it takes five seconds to proofread. What lazyness… Or maybe its a Freudian slip?

Borgia_dude · 2021-01-02T18:06:05.439Z

mobiusptc:

Borgia_dude:

Your people?

Damn, it takes five seconds to proofread. What lazyness… Or maybe its a Freudian slip?

So lazy.