If I fall asleep right now… and wake up in a hour… with Trump leading… can I claim massive fraud now?!
1 Like
JayJay
7944
Also ruled voters themselves could determine this, and in the other ruling, determined the time for raising such challenges had long since passed…and no votes will be thrown out because of this.
As we told you would happen. Courts never cast away votes of voters following the rules as they understood them at the time just because rules are later found out to be invalid.
The remedy is always…always…to correct things in future elections.
I don’t see why.
The case had nothing to do with the General Election conducted November 3rd. It wasn’t about fraud, it wasn’t trying to change the outcome, it wasn’t about election processing.
It was about a case from April where a couple of clerks that made a mistake in posting information on Facebook and quickly took it down rendering it moot. However the court decided to rule on the merits anyway today to preclude the same thing happening in the future.
Trump wasn’t invovled at all, and it in no way attempted to influence for or against Trump.
So no, it’s not “officially another win for Trump”.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS
2 Likes
WCD9973
7946
No, im not. Im saying it doesnt matter.
They can send you 100 applications for mail in voting,
They can send your dog a application for mail in voting.
It doesnt mean your dog will be able to have a vote counted or that you will get more then 1 vote counted.
Try it. Let me know what happens.
1 Like
Only if Dominion Machines are doing the counting.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS
Wisconsin absentee ballot rules
Any registered Wisconsin voter may apply for an absentee ballot and vote by mail.
Covid makes no difference. They don’t ask why you want to vote absentee…
It happens. Denying it can’t happen?
NickN
7950
A win is a win no matter what the remedy. Please chalk it up as such.
WCD9973
7951
So lets walk down this scenario and point out all the holes to explain why its NOT happening. .
You believe -That there are people out there that are fraudulently filling out mail in applications for real people.
(Keep in mind- The examples you gave with duplicates and people that werent registered getting applications isnt ballot harvesting. Cause if your dog got a ballot application, when they filled it out, it would get rejected. If your sister got 2 applications, and fllled them both out, they would get only 1.
But lets continue.
So someone else fills out a fraudulent application.
Then - that person stalks your mail box for the ballot to come (Since the address has to match the voting record, they have to check your mail every day to steal the ballot).
Then that person fills it out with their vote and what -Hopes you don’t ask for a mail in ballot or go to the polls. Cause if you did, you would be told you already voted.
AND - you think this is happening tens of thousands of times, without anyone reporting it?
Oh -And you also think its happening tens of thousands of times in a state that was going to vote Democrat anyway??
sure. Sounds reasonable.
5 Likes
It’s not a “win”. Trump lost the case.
It does not matter that they may have agreed with Trump’s team on a single issue of law, because they ruled against him in the end.
NickN
7953
Yes, state and local officials today got their hands slapped by the Wisconsin Supreme for acting incorrectly in sending out such information.
JayJay
7955
That’s nice. Means nothing.
Sknyluv
7956
As of 2:36pm EST: Biden 183 - Trump 173
Guys … I think Trump is gonna do it!!!
2 Likes
NickN
7957
Without this isolated portion now being considered an official win, it could not then possibly be cited in future cases with similar facts and circumstances either.
LucyLou
7958
Could you quote the part that says that?
Justice Jill Karofsky, an ultramarathon runner who won a landslide election this year to her post, tore into the lame-duck administration’s attorney James Troupis for suing only the two Wisconsin counties where the most Black people live: Milwaukee and Dane.
“This lawsuit, Mr. Troupis, smacks of racism,” Karofsky declared.
Doesn’t sound like a win.
It doesn’t magically become a “win” for Trump just because it sets precedent.
The Court said that the state cannot declare a class of people “indefinitely confined” by fiat - but they also made it clear that whether or not an individual voter does qualify as “indefinitely confined” is a question of fact involving the circumstances of that individual voter.
In other words, the Court said that in order to disqualify a single ballot because that voter was not legitimately “indefinitely confined”, the challenger must prove with a preponderance of evidence that that individual voter was not legitimately indefinitely confined.
Well, this is it, everyone. It’s the 14th of December.
I am a woman of my word, so I concede. Until next time.
1 Like
