oh you people would sell your mothers and cut off your right … umm… arm to find people who regret voting for Trump. You even send in fakers who say they voted for Trump but regret it. Hahahahahaha…
You ignore the fact that the black vote increased for Trump. And THEY were the target of much of your propaganda and lies that were intended to turn people against him. So your search will continue in vain.
Texas is normally represented in the U.S. Supreme Court by its solicitor general, Kyle Hawkins, who argued before the court last month in the challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate. However, Hawkins’ name does not appear on the filing.
Allan
I noticed that MSNBC is afraid to tell its base what’s happening.
81% of the counties Trump won in the swing states used Dominion machines.
Are you sure we shouldn’t be looking into how many TRUMP votes were fraudulently generated by Dominion algorithms?
And I’m still waiting for someone to explain to me how a HAND RECOUNT of all the Georgia ballots was able to replicate so precisely the algorithmic manipulations that supposedly gave Joe Biden the win in Georgia?
Something tells me I shouldn’t hold my breath awaiting a response…
Look at this new Georgia video “bombshell”, for example. We’ve got people on these boards making lists about it like it was completely unknown or unreported until Rudy Giuliani mentioned it at the Michigan “hearing”.
This is decidedly untrue…the Georgia video story first started circulating and was debunked two weeks before Giuliani reported in it…yet people here who think t truly shows fraud didn’t know that.
Left wing rags such as Lead Stories and the Washington Post saying that it has been debunked does not mean it was debunked.
As noted we have assurances that nothing was the problem when we have sworn affidavits from people saying that they were told to leave and counting was to be stopped. Yes they were told to leave. Hemingway documents the facts that show the video was not debunked, and a whole lot of evidence that points to fraud. Liberal ‘fact checking’ is exposed as false in that article.
I…thought you were a liberal for a second. Maybe I’m getting you confused with someone else. Thus I don’t think we’ve interacted before.
Hello there.
There’s nothing in this presentation that’s “new”.
So I’m not sure what the “bombshell” is supposed to be.
We also have sworn affidavits from election officials saying that no one was told to leave.
What would be helpful is a list of the names of all the election workers, officials, legislators, lieutenant governors, attorneys general, secretarys of state and judges who are complicit in the conspiracy you advance.
And we have the parts of the video that this lawyer did not show that show frame by frame the “thousands of ballots” were not hidden under a table all day but were opened and verified during the course of the day when officials were there monitoring, then placed in those official ballot boxes and placed under that table when they did think counting would stop. This also happened while witnesses were there.
And then when the SoS phoned in and asked counting to continue, these same boxes were retrieved and the ballots that had been verified were then counted.
We have all this on the surveillance video…which everyone knew was running…yet somehow Trump’s lawyers are expecting us to believe this type of fraud would be perpetrated with the cameras rolling.
SCOTUS just shot down the Pennsylvania lawsuit.
Texas up next.
Allan
“All of the networks courts!!!”
Are we done here yet?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-trump-pennsylvania-election-results/2020/12/08/4d39e16c-397d-11eb-98c4-25dc9f4987e8_story.html
Here the order short and sweet.
Allan
Alito.
Trumpsters, you told me that was your guy.
Sweet.
But Alito!
You guys really thought that politicians who have to worry about reelection and federal judges would spark a civil war in this country just to give your guy the presidency when he clearly lost?
Next -
Trumpers will argue that the state leg can still appoint other electors
Then -starting dec 14th they will argue that congress doesnt have to accept it. That the evidence will “SOON” be released and will result in congress rejecting it
Then -starting Jan 6th - they will move BACK to the SC will delay the swearing in based on evidence that is “about” to come out
then on Jan 20th -They will tell you that as soon as all the evidence is exposed (Which is really really really soon) impeachment will happen.
Not tired of winning.
