Roberts may have that power. But the conservative justices know that this will be a decision unmatched in importance throughout our history.
We now have the enemy, the domestic enemy that only they can stop. And Harris will ruin the court by stacking it with progs if the senate goes D in 2022. The conservative justices know this. They arnt idiots.
What decision? No evidence that anything impacted this election has been offered. As I see it, even if they listened to a case they would have to rule the same way as the lower courts. No evidence, no case. It really is that simple.
How many times do you have to read this âTHEY DONâT HAVE TO PLAY BY OLD ROUTINE RULESâ. Unless the constitution prohibits them, they can decide to hear new evidence. And if someone thinks they are behaving unconstitutionally, they only recourse would be to impeach the SCOTUS. MeanwhileâŚthe SCOTUS decision will stand.
We now have the enemy, the domestic enemy that only they can stop. And Harris will ruin the court by stacking it with progs if the senate goes D in 2022. The conservative justices know this. They arnt idiots.
Now why does that sound like making law from the bench?
Then impeach em. Thatâs your only recourse. In the mean time, their decision will stand.
What new evidence? There has been no evidence offered in any of these cases. What, do you think that all of a sudden new evidence is going to emerge so it can be shown to the SCOTUS? One of the first things that I learned in law school is that you present your best evidence first. So Iâm not really buying into the notion that we are over a month from election day and still there is no evidence of fraud.
Why do you say that? I trust that any Justice of the SCOTUS will not be beholding to the POTUS who put them on the bench before they uphold and defend the Constitution.
2 Likes
Sounds like a fever dream to me.
1 Like
Stop reading the narrative. Evidence is available. If the lower courts refused to see it, thatâs just another reason the SCOTUS can decide that the lower court is incapable of handling the case.
Oh⌠and it doesnât matter if the errors are by fraud or incompetence. The integrity of the election is whatâs at stake.
Speaking of narratives, they canât refuse to see something that was never presented to be seen. 
1 Like
This ainât your fatherâs SCOTUS case. This is the mother of all SCOTUS cases. The only limits will be the constitution. It will be unprecedented. Old rules are not the constraints. Precident is not the constraint. The constitution needs protection from the liars and deceivers. New rules will apply. And the thugs will start to burn down the nation. Thatâs a given. They have been practicing. And yet⌠your only real recourse will be to impeach the SCOTUS. Thugs will be rounded up and jailed or shot in the street
The ONLY rulings SCOTUS would be able to make are rulings that state the cases have to go back to lower courts to be heard.
It wasnât true then nor is it now.
The courts can and have ruled in the past that something was unconstitutional rather than simply remanding it back to the lower courts.
Bush v. Gore was remanded back to the Florida Supreme Court to rule consistent with the Supreme Court decision. Gore dropped the case rather than pursue it any farther.
They found the selective recount to be unconstitutional.
1 Like
The Supreme Court has the power to make a final ruling in any case, but they almost never do.
Yes, they did. And they remanded the case back to the Florida Supreme Court, to rule in line with that finding.
JayJay
4029
Only in those cases where the courts had already decided something as opposed to just dismissing it.
There was nothing left to litigate at that point because it was found to be unconstitutional.
And yet, they remanded it nonetheless. There were other legal avenues Gore could have tried to go down, but he chose not to.
Final paragraph of the Bush v. Gore opinion:
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
1 Like
