2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 1)

[conan]

Yes don’t believe what you’re seeing…believe us. Same people that lied about great Russian hoax…same people that lied about Ukraine etc.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

@JayJay

More proof that the “suitcases of ballots” was a nothingberder (these are tweets but they are news reporting tweets):

https://twitter.com/JustinGrayWSB/status/1334919773352812547?s=20

https://twitter.com/JustinGrayWSB/status/1334927307392356356?s=20

Goes to my earlier point…the video in question was surveillance video that was on all during the counting.

If you are sitting there believing that fraud is going to knowingly take place while being surveilled…I don’t know what I could tell you that would change your mind.

G L Hoffman

@JayJay If it was on, then show it. And show it for the times you say the counting was NOT going on.

[Snowfinch]

@WuWei

Sure, look at that too. All anomalies. I would start with what was changed claiming the 'Rona as justification though. We’ve got another one coming in 23 months and the same justification will be used then.

If I remember correctly, there were some significant changes made in various states shortly before the election.

The best analysis I can think of, and one that people claim is already done regularly, is to sample the voters who voted, track them down and interview them.

This would reveal (to a controllable significance):

The scale of stolen votes (whether mail theft, impersonation, unlawful requests)

The scale of non-voter votes (dead people, pets)

The scale of fraudulent vote (ballots introduced outside the poll book, or numbers invented inside the tabulator)

It might tell the scale of non-citizen votes.

It would not shed light on switched votes or mis-tabulated votes within the set of legal votes.

This is not insurmountable by any stretch and does not require the cooperation of anybody other than the contacted voters themselves. And could withstand significance resistance from that population as well via statistical methodologies.

[Zander]

The optimism and joy lies in the GOP civil war in Georgia, Flynn calling for martial law, and Giuliani farting. And then coming here and seeing the definition of anomaly posted.

[SpacemanSpiff]

@WCD9973

Both Dem candidates are now ahead in polling in GA.

The message of “Election is rigged, Your vote in GA doesnt matter” is going to backfire on Republicans.

Will be Ironic if Trumps last moves cost the Republicans the Senate.

As much as I’d like that to be true, the fact is that if there’s one thing Republicans can be counted on for it’s that they will always show up to vote. Why do you think low turnout always favors Republicans?

[WuWei]

That’s waaaay further than I would go. I’m not a fan of “tracking down” and interrogating voters.

I’m talking about the process.

[Call_me_Ishmael]

we would also need to know how/why they received and filed their ballot.

[conan]

They want you to not believe what your eyes are seeing.

[WorldWatcher]

@JimmyC

Fact Check: Video From Georgia Does NOT Show Suitcases Filled With Ballots Suspiciously Pulled From Under A Table; Poll Watchers Were NOT Told To Leave | Lead Stories

No, those claim are not true: Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state’s office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video. The officials said the ballots seen in the video were in regular ballot containers – not suitcases – and they had been removed from their envelopes and processed while news media and election observers for the Republican Party and Trump campaign were present. The media and party observers were never told to leave because counting was over for the night, but they apparently followed workers who left once their job of opening envelopes was completed, the chief investigator for the secretary of state told Lead Stories. The observers were free to return at anytime, she said. Georgia law allows observers, but does not require them to be there for ballots to be counted, she said.

@conan

Yeah right…normal activity my ass.

Ya, I know right.

Election Workers processing ballots on election night.

Shocked I say, SHOCKED!!!
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

[biggestal99]

@WuWei

Great! Who says so and what was the “human error”?

If it was truly an error why was he fired?

Why was the shortstop removed from the game?

He made an error and his manager removed him.

Same with this gentleman.

Removed by higher up for the error.

Allan

[conan]

@JayJay

How many different ways can I tell you that what they “revealed” yesterday wasn’t new?

You don’t get to tell us what is news or not.

We think it’s huge news. And as such it needs serious investigation. That us to be FBI job before they became so ■■■■■■■ corrupt.

[WuWei]

@biggestal99

@WuWei

Great! Who says so and what was the “human error”?

If it was truly an error why was he fired?

Why was the shortstop removed from the game?

He made an error and his manager removed him.

Same with this gentleman.

Removed by higher up for the error.

Allan

That is incorrect. And you know it.

[Snowfinch]

@WuWei

That’s waaaay further than I would go. I’m not a fan or “tracking down” and interrogating voters.

I’m talking about the process.

I think this is already done. It is one way they clear voter roles. Mail out a slip to voters, if the slip comes back from post office undeliverable then not a valid registration. I receive these in my state.

The level of intrusion can start there which measures the scale of many classes of irregularity, and increase based on how much you desire the answer to your questions about how to measure the baseline of fraud or inaccuracies.

We do it for the census already.

[WorldWatcher]

@Call_me_Ishmael

we would also need to know how/why they received and filed their ballot.

The how is already known by the Election Office.

The “why” someone deciding to vote is none of our business.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

[WuWei]

@Snowfinch

@WuWei

That’s waaaay further than I would go. I’m not a fan or “tracking down” and interrogating voters.

I’m talking about the process.

I think this is already done. It is one way they clear voter roles. Mail out a slip to voters, if the slip comes back from post office undeliverable then not a valid registration. I receive these in my state.

The level of intrusion can start there which measures the scale of many classes of irregularity, and increase based on how much you desire the answer to your questions about how to measure the baseline of fraud or inaccuracies.

We do it for the census already.

“Slip” being a ballot?

[AmusedObserver]

@WuWei

@LucyLou

No, you don’t want that. If you did, you could go elsewhere and find it. It’s not hard.

A female telling me what I want and what I can do. Interesting.

Matriarchy must be better than patriarchy. Somehow.

I wonder what our host would think of this post.

It’s certainly off topic, at the very least.

[JayJay]

Define the normal election process baseline.

[WorldWatcher]

@WuWei

@Snowfinch

@WuWei

That’s waaaay further than I would go. I’m not a fan or “tracking down” and interrogating voters.

I’m talking about the process.

I think this is already done. It is one way they clear voter roles. Mail out a slip to voters, if the slip comes back from post office undeliverable then not a valid registration. I receive these in my state.

The level of intrusion can start there which measures the scale of many classes of irregularity, and increase based on how much you desire the answer to your questions about how to measure the baseline of fraud or inaccuracies.

We do it for the census already.

“Slip” being a ballot?

No, “slip” being probably a letter or post card mailed well prior to election day to validate the address on file for the registered voter.

.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

[JayJay]

Provide us your credentials regarding vote counting processes so we can judge your ability to determine what activities are normal and what are not.

Take your time.

We’ll wait.

[WuWei]

Go ask him.