It’s not that they won’t surrender. It’s that they have surrendered to the worst people in the worst way.
Surrender!
Never!! I’ll file another lawsuit! And you can pry these memes from my cold dead hands!
It’s just that this is starting to get kinda embarrassing.
I do give Trump credit. He conned his base out of north of $200M.
I did like the story of the guy who give him $2.5M and then asked for his money back when he discovered that they really didn’t have any hard evidence.
But he heard it on Newsthud!
lol. NPD is a pervasive disorder (as are all personality disorders) of grandiosity, entitlement, and lack of empathy. It is in the cluster B category of personality disorders, meaning these individuals have interpersonal difficulties and are more likely to abuse others. They employ a defense mechanism called “splitting,” or “dichotomous thinking,” due to lack of object relations and object consistency- which in turn is due to inconsistent attachment and other attachment traumas. While individuals with NPD have an air of arrogance, it masks an ashamed, fragile person underneath whom they compensate for- their grandiose self is their “false self.” Etiology of this disorder focuses mainly on severe emotional abuse and over-spoiling/smuthering (disregarding a child’s need for autonomy; which is why narcissists often see other people as extensions of themselves).
Individuals on the severe end of the spectrum often exhibit additional traits of BPD, ASPD, or both.
Case study- Elliot Roger (Santa Barbara mass shooting in 2014)
Nice work, but an example of missing the forest for the trees. Not the case example I had in mind…
Additionally, there are three types of NPD according to Gestalt therapists and those who follow Masterson’s school of thought (depending on how they get their supply): Grandiose, Closet, and Toxic/Malignant.
Gestalt therapists are still around?
Fritz would be proud.
Remedies cannot be applied that far outstrip the perceived harm.
How about the SCOTUS remedy is merely granting Texas what they essentially asked for in having those 4 state legislation’s each decide how their respective electoral votes will go as the Constitution permits.
Check out this article on what happened in the General Election of 1876…
https://blog.timesunion.com/frankrobinson/2020/10/12/the-disputed-presidential-election-of-1876/
How about the SCOTUS remedy is merely granting Texas what they essentially asked for in having those 4 state legislation’s each decide how their respective electoral votes will go as the Constitution permits.
Because there are a bunch of laws specifically against doing that.
It’s not 1876.
You asked me a question and I answered it.
What’s your next idotic statement?
Elenor Greenburg, Ph.D. In New York City. Trained by Masterson himself.
I do give Trump credit. He conned his base out of north of $200M.
I did like the story of the guy who give him $2.5M and then asked for his money back when he discovered that they really didn’t have any hard evidence.
Kinda makes you wonder how somebody who’s such a sucker could have acquired millions in the first place.
41 minutes until the safe harbor deadline passes.
Louisiana
Remedies cannot be applied that far outstrip the perceived harm.
there would be no harm. We are removing illegitimate votes that disenfranchise legal votes. That’s a good thing. Or you disagree?
Alabama
Arkansas
Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
Posting the Supreme Court docket link again for the Texas case.
A “docket” is merely a list of a court’s cases. When a Supreme Court case is filed, it is docketed when the Supreme Court is officially notified that all parties required to be served with notice of the case have been served. The Texas case was filed on December 7th, but docketed on December 8th.
Simultaneously with filing the case on December 7th, Texas filed a motion to expedite consideration of the case and a motion for a preliminary injunction.
The Supreme Court has required the Defendant States to respond both to the Motion for Leave to file a Bill of Complaint and to the Motion for a preliminary injunction by December 10th.
Once the Defendant States file their responses, I expect the Supreme Court to be fairly swift in both denying preliminary injunction and deny Leave to file a Bill of Complaint, thereby ending the case.
And then what? Does the secession begin then or after the EC votes?