2020 Election Fraud Thread (Part 1)

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T17:55:29.374Z

rp5x5:

Jezcoe:

conan:

There is no voters fraud.

There is no wide spread voters fraud.

There wasn’t enough fraud to overturn the election.

First one not true.

Second and third one true.

It’s totally proven. Time to pay attention

Green beck?

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T17:55:54.767Z

conan:

Right…

You should try it.

JayJay · 2020-12-07T17:57:19.207Z

conan:

Right…we still have libs here insisting their is no voters fraud.

No one has ever insisted that.

You should try and get what people say correct.

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T17:57:47.694Z

conan:

You mean the ones counting the ballots?

The ones counting the ballots, the one overseeing the process, the ones elected to do the job, and the ones charged with investigation of the process.

All of them found nothing wrong.

conan · 2020-12-07T17:58:25.644Z

But yet you have witness saying they were closing for the night.

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T18:00:03.005Z

conan:

But yet you have witness saying they were closing for the night.

You have witness who thought they were closing but we’re not told they were closing. Which is also besides the point because the chain of custody of ballot remained visible and secure the entire time.

Educate yourself

Call_me_Ishmael · 2020-12-07T18:01:10.562Z

conan:

There is no voters fraud.

There is no wide spread voters fraud.

There wasn’t enough fraud to overturn the election.

And finally…

“It’s too late to do anything about it.”

conan · 2020-12-07T18:02:52.030Z

Right…

After you educated yourself first.

conan · 2020-12-07T18:03:14.938Z

Precisely.

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T18:07:03.534Z

conan:

Right…

After you educated yourself first.

Well yeah the timeline matches, not sure how an election in georgia was affected by my job on the west coast but sure…

conan · 2020-12-07T18:09:16.973Z

Now you’re rambling…

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T18:10:07.014Z

conan:

Now you’re rambling…

Am I?

conan · 2020-12-07T18:10:37.236Z

Educate yourself…

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T18:13:09.828Z

conan:

Educate yourself…

Ah the parrot approach, not Capa Ferro quality I am afraid, most go with Thibaut

Snowfinch · 2020-12-07T18:13:56.132Z

GWH:

No, he’s not. And I don’t say this with the hope that he somehow gets another term, but if there is fraud with mail in ballots, voter machines or ballot stuffing, it needs to be investigated and people found guilty need to go to jail or at the very least, fix it with VoterID. There can’t be mistrust in our electoral process.

If it is found that some fraud claims are based on lies or willful negligence and intentional misinterpretation of events should the offenders be punished as well?

conan · 2020-12-07T18:15:37.629Z

Its sad how effective left-wing propaganda machine actually on so-called educated libs.

Call_me_Ishmael · 2020-12-07T18:17:27.048Z

conan:

Its sad how effective left-wing propaganda machine actually on so-called educated libs.

The communists have a definition of “education” that fits your observation to a T.

Actually the intelligentsia of the left embraces that definition too.

mobiusptc · 2020-12-07T18:19:00.789Z

conan:

Its sad how effective left-wing propaganda machine actually on so-called educated libs.

It’s even sadder on how easy it is to be educated on the voting process of different states via their websites which would remove the entire beliefs of a left wing propaganda conspiracy and still people refuse to take that one , simple, basic step.

Argle bargle!

It’s not even hard, the information was posted many many times in this very thread

WCD9973 · 2020-12-07T18:20:02.486Z

Continue to be amazed at a group of people who seem to not understand voting, federal law, State law, ballot counting or even math tell others to “educate themselves”.

DougBH · 2020-12-07T18:22:28.239Z

Jezcoe:

GWH:

Not if you proved it.

Right.

And the claims being made by the Trump team continue to be baseless.

So when is it time to accept that they have no proof that it happened?

Not that sure they are all as baseless as the mass media claims. The counting of ballots from suitcases after the vote watchers left has been almost universally “debunked”. For some reason, it is important that these were not “suitcases” but boxes. IMO that debunked nothing. Then we are told that the person who yelled out that they were “through” was only talking about one process and not the counting of the ballots themselves…and that the watchers voluntarily left.
But it appears that the vote watchers believed that a the entire counting was over…the person didn’t yell that “one part of the process is through” they yelled that they were through.
Sure they weren’t forced out, but if they were mislead into believing that the whole counting was over and that is why they left, and no one informed them otherwise, has this problem really been “debunked”…
I would say it is rather that the declaration of the “debunking” is debunked.