They shouldn’t.
No they don’t.
I would say there is a bit of overlappin’ but not much.
You seem to be assuming the teacher makes the determination as to whether or not abuse has occurred?
Yes, they make a determination based on predetermined indicators.
the teacher THOUGHT the child was endangered
No she didn’t.
No they don’t
Food
Shelter
Discipline
WuWei:
You seem to be assuming the teacher makes the determination as to whether or not abuse has occurred?
Yes, they make a determination based on predetermined indicators.
Not whether or not abuse has occurred, no they do not.
Link to the thread please.
What evidence of child endangerment did she see?
conan:
No they don’t
Food
Shelter
Discipline
Not discipline. Simply behavior required for admission.
WuWei:
Harm. There was no harm in the zoom case. In your hypothetical, there is harm. Which means it is ex post facto, not prior restraint. When harm has been done, responsibilities change. We punish, investigate, etc., after harm has been done. Not because we feel it may be done in the future. Law is reactive, not proactive.
Common law principles. Right @TheDoctorIsIn?
Mandatory reporting include child endangerment. For example if the kids parents are running a drug ring in the house. No physical abuse but endangerment.
In the zoom case… the teacher THOUGHT the child was endangered. Student was off campus but “in-school”.
Why was she told to mind her business?
Having a gun in the house does not mean a child is endangered. The teacher was letting her personal beliefs interfere. Period.
Having a gun in the house does not mean a child is endangered. The teacher was letting her personal beliefs interfere. Period.
That’s your opinion.
She used her judgement based on her mandatory reporting requirements
Not discipline. Simply behavior required for admission.
Yes, they discipline for conduct that happens on campus
RTchoke:
Having a gun in the house does not mean a child is endangered. The teacher was letting her personal beliefs interfere. Period.
That’s your opinion.
She used her judgement based on her mandatory reporting requirements
Where is it mandatory to report that a gun is in a student’s home and ONLY that scenario?
RTchoke:
Having a gun in the house does not mean a child is endangered. The teacher was letting her personal beliefs interfere. Period.
That’s your opinion.
She used her judgement based on her mandatory reporting requirements
She was not mandated to report the presence of a firearm in a home.
Get off the Silly Road.
No, that’s the law.
WuWei:
Not discipline. Simply behavior required for admission.
Yes, they discipline for conduct that happens on campus
No, they don’t. They suspend and expel. No admission until the behavior is corrected.
She used her judgement based on her mandatory reporting requirements
What “mandatory reporting requirements” require teachers to report child abuse because of a firearm being seen in the home?
Where is it mandatory to report that a gun is in a student’s home and ONLY that scenario?
Child endangerment
RTchoke:
Where is it mandatory to report that a gun is in a student’s home and ONLY that scenario?
Child endangerment
No, try again.
No, they don’t. They suspend and expel. No admission until the behavior is corrected.
You just described discipline. It’s punitive
WuWei:
No, they don’t. They suspend and expel. No admission until the behavior is corrected.
You just described discipline. It’s punitive
No, it is not. You think the school is “punishing” a kid by making him not go to school?