Mind boggling response. Please let me know what you think my point was in calling hysteria - hysteria.
Samm
324
I donât know ⌠maybe youâre being hysterical.
3 Likes
And what about those who depend on them?
This most threads around here. And the sad part is that many of them actually believe it.
The current M.O. seems to be to put more and more merch behind locked cases. Really sucks too because you have to track down an employee just to get something like toothpaste.
DougBH
330
But there are areas where DAâs are doing exactly what you are saying you are not arguing forâŚDallas for example. When a DA decides they will not enforce existing laws, that DA is the one who has politicized the law. The response will necessarily also be political.
3 Likes
Well, for example, my local Walgreens is the closest pharmacy in a over a mile.
Samm
333
Thanks for demonstrating my point. 
2 Likes
If they want a close by Walgreens then the thieves should stop stealing.
Very simple.
If I was Walgreens i would shut down every SF pharmacy.
Are you sure about that one?
Most of Walgreenâs customers arenât thieves.
If I was Walgreens i would shut down every SF pharmacy.
If I was Walgreens Iâd base on whether or not I was still making enough profit after losses.

Samm:
Yes. Very sure.
And thanks again. 
You admit yâall are claiming to see things that arenât really there?
Samm
339
Just never know when to stop, do you. 
1 Like
Iâm trying to figure out how the cartoon posted proves your point when it does the opposite.
Itâs just knee jerk.
Itâs nice to see the ducks again, though.
DMK
342
What about under a mile?
And if your local Walgreens is the closest to you, would you not want to revise your local laws so it would be able to turn a profit and stay?
It only takes a few stealing multiple times a day to (1) endanger the lives of the employees and customers and (2) lose profit.
Walgreens isnât in the charity business. 
3 Likes