No, we’re also going to be passing a Constitutional amendment to restore all rights to our citizens who have been convicted of cannabis-only “crimes” (including expungement).
There’s another in the works but I don’t know if it’s up this year or not yet, but it’s to restore all rights and privileges to felons who complete their terms of punishment.
This State’s trend has been gaining rights lately. It’s great stuff. Messy, but great.
The CDC. Lots of ways to get the info.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2201761
1 Like
Yes. A death requires both a person to die and a cause. Take away the person and there is no death. A town with a population of zero has no motor vehicle, firearm or deaths of any cause. It has a death rate of zero.
I’m down to a handgun passed down by a family member and an AR-15 given to me as a gift. I’d love a legal excuse to get rid of the AR-15 so I wouldn’t upset the one who gave it to me since they ask me about it and occasionally ask me to fire it with them. It otherwise remains disassembled and locked away. The handgun is kept in the same manner. I won’t miss it.
WuWei
1734
Right. Take away the perpetrator and there is no crime nor victim.
Every death is a crime with a perpetrator and victim?
WuWei
1736
Now, here’s a bit of truth for all you "whu bout other dEvElOped CoUntRIEs?
Mass shootings get the most attention, but they account for tiny fraction of total gun deaths in the U.S., data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show. Among the nation’s 36,252 firearms-related fatalities in 2015, 61% were suicides and most of the rest were ordinary homicides.
Neither of those kinds of deaths actually fell in Australia as a result of the National Firearms Agreement, researchers reported Tuesday in the American Journal of Public Health.
On a spring day in the Tasmanian town of Port Arthur, a lone gunman shot an elderly couple at the inn they owned, 22 diners lunching at a nearby tourist spot, two tour bus drivers and several of their passengers, four occupants of a BMW, and two...
You feel you’re going to take my right because of suicides?
2 Likes
WuWei
1737
What? Are you trying to prevent death?
Of course. Cancer deaths, infectious disease deaths, motor vehicle deaths, firearm deaths. All of them. If you want to discuss death from “natural causes” that’s a different conversation. And no, firearm death is not “natural causes.”

SixFoot:

PurpnGold:
.003% like he said lol.
Weren’t you an engineer?
I was gonna let @Orygun 's bad math slide since he’s had a hard enough time carrying that water, but then @PurpnGold wanted to show the class that a generic computer nerd can’t get it right either:
420,000 / 132,000,000
=
0.0031818181818182
Now, you multiply that by 100 to get the percentage (they teach this to elementary students who actually pay attention to basic math):
=
0.318%
That rounds up to 0.32%
These are the same “educated” types who want a say in your right to bear arms, folks. 
Yep. I concede I was wrong. Sometimes I forget that last step. @Samm my bad too.
1 Like
WuWei
1740

SottoVoce:
Of course. Cancer deaths, infectious disease deaths, motor vehicle deaths, firearm deaths. All of them. If you want to discuss death from “natural causes” that’s a different conversation. And no, firearm death is not “natural causes.”
Amazing.
Cancer and infectious diseases are not natural causes? Bats aren’t natural?
What do all your other wants have in common?
Are you trying to not die or live?
If you don’t want them then sell them.
In todays market you’d sell them in about five minutes after listing.
WuWei
1743
Did you have a background check and 4473 on either? Tax stamp?
I’ll send somebody around to pick them both up today. We’re going to disarm you because somebody did something bad somewhere.
You’re more concerned about your friends feelings than saving the children?
3 Likes
Guvnah
1744

SottoVoce:
Hmmm…
How old was Salvador Ramos? Who bought the firearms he used?
Not “a single one” would have stopped it, except for the one that would have.
You can’t claim that would have stopped him. It simply would have limited the firearm he used.
That was already pointed out to you earlier. Ignoring that fact won’t change it.
JimmyC
1745
Guvnah
1746
Libs know you’re not OK with it. They know it, but they repeat it anyway. Maybe it’s for internet points. Or something.
Orygun
1748
Oh my fault- hadn’t thought of the feral pigs.
…
“I’m law abiding, I’ve never done anything, I use it to kill feral pigs. The action of a criminal deprives me of my right,” the senator said.
1 Like
Orygun
1749
NRA convention tonight in Texas. Should be some good clips!