Pretty easy.
You file a complaint. Failure to respond results in summary judgement against you.
WW
e7alr
328
Having a lawyer respond isnāt the same as taking part. Compelling him to say anything or cooperate in any way past appearing is the stretch. And this seems to be a question for the voters, not the courts.
1 Like
What makes you think he would be compelled. He can still claim 5th Amendment privilege against self incrimination if he decides to testify.
WW
e7alr
330
What I have read here is he has to prove he didnāt aid an insurrection. The accused doesnāt have to prove anything, that task belongs to the accusers.
1 Like
I do not appreciate you stealing my thunder! But the fact is, that is exactly what the current Democrat Party Leadership has devolved into!
.
JWK
The Democrat Party Leadership, once an advocate for hard working American citizens and their families, is now their most formidable domestic enemy.
.
.
The question repeatedly asked is . . . Has anyone been charged with insurrection with respect to the Jan. 6th event?
JWK
Our socialist revolutionaries are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
You are absolutely correct. There were small insignificant pockets of insurrection taking place . . . and evidence confirms in some cases it was actually orchestrated by government actors.
As to this current 14th Amendment crap, it has been best described as follows:
So, for all intents and purposes, we are back to the same phony āRussian collusionā crap . . a mere distraction to obscure the fact the current Democrat Party Leadership is engaging in a variety of things designed to destroy the United States from within ___ importing, by the millions, the poverty stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, and criminal populations of other countries into the United States; allowing deadly drugs to flood across our border; inflating our currency to a degree its purchasing power is drastically diminishing and prices are increasing to unbearable levels for Americaās families; shutting down, by needless regulations, our countryās ability to produce cheap fuel and be energy independent; and all this is in addition to their sexually grooming and propagandizing innocent and vulnerable grade school children.
Is it not reasonable to believe these acts amount to an intentional domestic attack on the United States and her citizens?
JWK
Todayās Democrat Party Leadership is infested with Socialist Revolutionaries, the same kind that took over Cuba and now rule over the people with an iron fist!
Not when it is a frivolous lawsuit in which case the court immediately dismisses it, after which the lawyers ought to be reprimanded by the Court, if not brought before the bar association!
JWK
You should tell the Judge in the MTG case where she testified YESTERDAY on the same issue.
Funny, the Judge ruled the case would proceed and her testimony was streamed yesterday.
WW
What is funny is your deflection ___ a very old and tired stupid debating trick.
JWK
The Democrat Party Leadership, once an advocate for hard working American citizens and their families, has now GONE MAD
What deflection.
She was at a hearing for the same type of challenge.
You memeās make the responding post look - ah - uninformed.
WW
Yes. A deflection ignoring what is and what is not a frivolous lawsuit, and deflecting by pointing to a political hack judge ___ U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, a Barack Obama appointee who is the sister of NPR legal correspondent Nina Totenberg,
The 14th Amendment insurrection lawsuit is unquestionably frivolous and ". . . a tactic, which is all Democrats have left since they canāt run on Bidenās disastrous presidencyā. Additionally your mentioned judge is now knowingly part of an active collusion in subverting the text and legislative intent of the 14th Amendment.
JWK
Why have a written constitution approved by the people if those who it is designed to control are free to make it mean whatever they wish it to mean?
so because mtg chose not to appeal you somehow think its definitive?
hint: its not
DougBH
340
Which has nothing to do with insurrection. Do you have any red apples? Well, some of them are green.
DougBH
341
IMO yes. Seditious conspiracy means at least two people planned to interfere with the enforcement of a law. Insurrection means overthrowing a government.
1 Like
I donāt know if she will appeal or not, the court hasnāt rendered a decision.
I expect the court to find her eligible to appear on the ballot, so if she wins I doubt she will appeal. If she loses, I fully expect and appeal.
Cawthorne on the other hand challenged the Board of Elections review and won. So now it would be up to the BOE to appeal that Judges ruling if they choose.
WW
Samm
343
Does the 14th Amendment repeal the 5th?
The lawsuit is the due process
Thank you Iām not a lawyer.
Although there a good possibility that I did conceive one at a Holiday Inn Express.
WW
1 Like
